<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter&#8217;s not a site, it&#8217;s a protocol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/</link>
	<description>Technology changes you man.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:47:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ.

&quot;The other day, I posted my first tweet with a swearword in it. It was a surprisingly emotional moment. I had to consider why I was swearing, and what it would do to my social graph, and whether I cared. In the end, I decided I didn’t care — the people who know me can follow, and the rest of them, well, they can leave.&quot;

The justification for this service is that it allows you to view and manage an artificial social graph centered on your existence? Did padding your Facebook friends list become too tedious?

If you really don&#039;t care what people think about you, why are you writing about how this service for preening and managing your own self-image is so great that it deserves to be elevated to the status of protocol?

&quot;This notion of whether you care if you’re followed is an elephant in the Twitter room. People want to seem smart. They want the affirmation of retweeting. They want to be noticed.&quot;

Is that what we need, a hub where insecure posers can jostle for attention and posture for each other?

I don&#039;t want to attack you. But I think you need to hear frankly that none of what you write here is compelling to anyone not motivated to participate in online popularity contests.

In personal interactions, affirmation and validation seeking behaviors are habits of insecure personalities, exhibited by people who we conventionally regards as needing to develop their own self-confidence before they can function socially. Would you hang out with someone in person whose MO in navigating social circles is to find affirmation and validation?

&quot;...I want to get together with others and bitch about them to feel reaffirmed. But if I love a company, I want to personally connect with them in the hopes of their affirmation and acknowledgement.&quot;

Your writeup of Twitter here emphasizes as a benefit the fact that it plays to and encourages people to be affirmation seekers and toadies. I would argue that most people not only recognize this fact but also reject it as an undesirable feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ.</p>
<p>&#8220;The other day, I posted my first tweet with a swearword in it. It was a surprisingly emotional moment. I had to consider why I was swearing, and what it would do to my social graph, and whether I cared. In the end, I decided I didn’t care — the people who know me can follow, and the rest of them, well, they can leave.&#8221;</p>
<p>The justification for this service is that it allows you to view and manage an artificial social graph centered on your existence? Did padding your Facebook friends list become too tedious?</p>
<p>If you really don&#8217;t care what people think about you, why are you writing about how this service for preening and managing your own self-image is so great that it deserves to be elevated to the status of protocol?</p>
<p>&#8220;This notion of whether you care if you’re followed is an elephant in the Twitter room. People want to seem smart. They want the affirmation of retweeting. They want to be noticed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that what we need, a hub where insecure posers can jostle for attention and posture for each other?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to attack you. But I think you need to hear frankly that none of what you write here is compelling to anyone not motivated to participate in online popularity contests.</p>
<p>In personal interactions, affirmation and validation seeking behaviors are habits of insecure personalities, exhibited by people who we conventionally regards as needing to develop their own self-confidence before they can function socially. Would you hang out with someone in person whose MO in navigating social circles is to find affirmation and validation?</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;I want to get together with others and bitch about them to feel reaffirmed. But if I love a company, I want to personally connect with them in the hopes of their affirmation and acknowledgement.&#8221;</p>
<p>Your writeup of Twitter here emphasizes as a benefit the fact that it plays to and encourages people to be affirmation seekers and toadies. I would argue that most people not only recognize this fact but also reject it as an undesirable feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renjie Butalid &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Taking a dip back into the blogosphere&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Renjie Butalid &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Taking a dip back into the blogosphere&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 07:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-249</guid>
		<description>[...] limit, forcing me to get my ideas across in real-time in a clear yet concise manner. (Click here for a great article that demystifies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] limit, forcing me to get my ideas across in real-time in a clear yet concise manner. (Click here for a great article that demystifies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firecracker</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Firecracker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-248</guid>
		<description>I have to gush....this is such a wonderful post! No BS, great content, cleared up alot of things for me. I&#039;m an avid Facebook and Twitter user and will definitely reference your post..just wish I could RT this easily ;-)

On a related note, my day job involves helping clients monitor and block data loss over various channels. I&#039;m curious as to who out there actually has a solution to monitor Twitter on the network and block it. Pardon me if you&#039;ve covered this in another post, but does Twitter port hop and can it evade traditional network firewalls?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to gush&#8230;.this is such a wonderful post! No BS, great content, cleared up alot of things for me. I&#8217;m an avid Facebook and Twitter user and will definitely reference your post..just wish I could RT this easily ;-)</p>
<p>On a related note, my day job involves helping clients monitor and block data loss over various channels. I&#8217;m curious as to who out there actually has a solution to monitor Twitter on the network and block it. Pardon me if you&#8217;ve covered this in another post, but does Twitter port hop and can it evade traditional network firewalls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLoS ONE on Twitter and FriendFeed &#171; everyONE - the PLoS ONE community blog</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>PLoS ONE on Twitter and FriendFeed &#171; everyONE - the PLoS ONE community blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-247</guid>
		<description>[...] is a communications tool (or a &#8216;human application&#8217;). You can broadcast (one-to-many), you can eavesdrop (many-to-one) or you can converse (one-to-one, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a communications tool (or a &#8216;human application&#8217;). You can broadcast (one-to-many), you can eavesdrop (many-to-one) or you can converse (one-to-one, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digforleadership.com</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>digforleadership.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-246</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Twitter is a protocol not a website...&lt;/strong&gt;

In short, Twitter is a human API. It’s being defined in real time in front of our eyes, through an amazing example of Internet Darwinism....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Twitter is a protocol not a website&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In short, Twitter is a human API. It’s being defined in real time in front of our eyes, through an amazing example of Internet Darwinism&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-03-12 &#171; Using technology in the voluntary and community sector</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-03-12 &#171; Using technology in the voluntary and community sector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-245</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter’s not a site, it’s a protocol &quot;Twitter-like micromessaging is a relatively new communications model, with unique characteristics that affect how we use it and what’s appropriate. It’s an RSS feed for people, a way to directing the attention of audiences, and a means of reaching the famous without burdening them with an obligation to respond. In short, Twitter is a human API. It’s being defined in real time in front of our eyes, through an amazing example of Internet Darwinism.&quot; (tags: socialmedia web2.0 twitter communication insight theory) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter’s not a site, it’s a protocol &quot;Twitter-like micromessaging is a relatively new communications model, with unique characteristics that affect how we use it and what’s appropriate. It’s an RSS feed for people, a way to directing the attention of audiences, and a means of reaching the famous without burdening them with an obligation to respond. In short, Twitter is a human API. It’s being defined in real time in front of our eyes, through an amazing example of Internet Darwinism.&quot; (tags: socialmedia web2.0 twitter communication insight theory) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can the World Change? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Taking a dip back into the blogosphere&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Can the World Change? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Taking a dip back into the blogosphere&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-244</guid>
		<description>[...] limit, forcing me to get my ideas across in real-time in a clear yet concise manner. (Click here for a great article that demystifies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] limit, forcing me to get my ideas across in real-time in a clear yet concise manner. (Click here for a great article that demystifies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why should photographers use Twitter? &#124; Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Why should photographers use Twitter? &#124; Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-243</guid>
		<description>[...] Related: Great post about Twitter for the geeks by Alistair Croll, Twitter’s not a site, it’s a protocol [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related: Great post about Twitter for the geeks by Alistair Croll, Twitter’s not a site, it’s a protocol [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Cecala</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Cecala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Great analysis. How soon until a Ph.D. thesis is written about Twitter?

Today I was struck by the power of searching the &quot;twittersphere&quot;. Results come up in real time, it&#039;s like an index into the collective mind.

To me, Twitter is the new &quot;dial tone&quot;. It is THE NEW protocol for connecting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analysis. How soon until a Ph.D. thesis is written about Twitter?</p>
<p>Today I was struck by the power of searching the &#8220;twittersphere&#8221;. Results come up in real time, it&#8217;s like an index into the collective mind.</p>
<p>To me, Twitter is the new &#8220;dial tone&#8221;. It is THE NEW protocol for connecting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 2009-03-04 - Adam Crowe</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 2009-03-04 - Adam Crowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-241</guid>
		<description>[...] on GoogleThinkSketch -- From microblog to Network Protocol: How Twitter will redefine the InternetBitcurrent -- Twitter’s not a site, it’s a protocolMonkchips -- Asymmetrical Follow: A Core Web 2.0 PatternYvoSchaap -- [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on GoogleThinkSketch &#8212; From microblog to Network Protocol: How Twitter will redefine the InternetBitcurrent &#8212; Twitter’s not a site, it’s a protocolMonkchips &#8212; Asymmetrical Follow: A Core Web 2.0 PatternYvoSchaap &#8212; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-03-02 &#171; Where is my towel?</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-03-02 &#171; Where is my towel?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 07:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-240</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter’s not a site, it’s a protocol &#124; Bitcurrent (tags: twitter protocol ****) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter’s not a site, it’s a protocol | Bitcurrent (tags: twitter protocol ****) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThinkSketch</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>ThinkSketch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-239</guid>
		<description>From microblog to Network Protocol: How Twitter will redefine the Internet

I just wrote a blog post in a similar vein, and then found this post.  Nice thinking bitcurrent.  Come check out my take on it -

http://thinksketch.wordpress.com/2009/02/25/from-microblog-to-network-protocol-how-twitter-will-redefine-the-internet/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From microblog to Network Protocol: How Twitter will redefine the Internet</p>
<p>I just wrote a blog post in a similar vein, and then found this post.  Nice thinking bitcurrent.  Come check out my take on it -</p>
<p><a href="http://thinksketch.wordpress.com/2009/02/25/from-microblog-to-network-protocol-how-twitter-will-redefine-the-internet/" rel="nofollow">http://thinksketch.wordpress.com/2009/02/25/from-microblog-to-network-protocol-how-twitter-will-redefine-the-internet/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L S U A ~ A KM Blog Thinking Outside The Inbox by Luis Suarez &#187; Using Twitter in the Enterprise by Ed Yourdon</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>E L S U A ~ A KM Blog Thinking Outside The Inbox by Luis Suarez &#187; Using Twitter in the Enterprise by Ed Yourdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-238</guid>
		<description>[...] this point in time I am sure that, if you have been paying attention to the growing number of articles, blog posts, tutorials, education materials, helpful tips, useful resources, wonderful insights, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this point in time I am sure that, if you have been paying attention to the growing number of articles, blog posts, tutorials, education materials, helpful tips, useful resources, wonderful insights, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kas Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Kas Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Nice post. Personally, I wish somehow more syntactical devices (operators, keywords) would find their way into Twitter. I also think Twitter&#039;s growth is throttled by the quality of Search available. If you can&#039;t find people or concepts or [whatever] on Twitter, easily and quickly, it limits its usefulness. It&#039;s obviously useful already but could be much more useful, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. Personally, I wish somehow more syntactical devices (operators, keywords) would find their way into Twitter. I also think Twitter&#8217;s growth is throttled by the quality of Search available. If you can&#8217;t find people or concepts or [whatever] on Twitter, easily and quickly, it limits its usefulness. It&#8217;s obviously useful already but could be much more useful, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La empresa propone, y el usuario dispone&#8230; &#171; Aprender a emprender</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>La empresa propone, y el usuario dispone&#8230; &#171; Aprender a emprender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-236</guid>
		<description>[...] que Twitter pueda aprovechar de alguna manera (como, por ejemplo, ocurre con Facebook). De hecho, alguno ya considera que Twitter no es una empresa o una plataforma, sino un [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] que Twitter pueda aprovechar de alguna manera (como, por ejemplo, ocurre con Facebook). De hecho, alguno ya considera que Twitter no es una empresa o una plataforma, sino un [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Great post, thanks. I really liked the comment that &#039;The lack of conversational context stops Twitter from devolving into a partyline&#039;. It&#039;s true that no one wants to really watch people sling mud back and forth - the spamming and trolling just can&#039;t happen to any extent, people just stop following those attempting it, and it&#039;s hard for anyone to fling emotional responses back and forth for long. Interesting stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, thanks. I really liked the comment that &#8216;The lack of conversational context stops Twitter from devolving into a partyline&#8217;. It&#8217;s true that no one wants to really watch people sling mud back and forth &#8211; the spamming and trolling just can&#8217;t happen to any extent, people just stop following those attempting it, and it&#8217;s hard for anyone to fling emotional responses back and forth for long. Interesting stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blayne Sucks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Twitter Monoculture</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Blayne Sucks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Twitter Monoculture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-234</guid>
		<description>[...] same as open source, and it does not eliminate the threats posed by monocultures. It does mean that it is very easy to add functionality to the Twitter protocol, but it does not mean that you can participate freely without a Twitter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] same as open source, and it does not eliminate the threats posed by monocultures. It does mean that it is very easy to add functionality to the Twitter protocol, but it does not mean that you can participate freely without a Twitter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acidlabs &#187; This Week’s Links on&#160;Ma.gnolia</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>acidlabs &#187; This Week’s Links on&#160;Ma.gnolia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-233</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter’s not a site, it’s a protocol &#124;&#160;Bitcurrent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter’s not a site, it’s a protocol |&nbsp;Bitcurrent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Phish-O-Rama</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Phish-O-Rama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-232</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter’s not a site, it’s a protocol [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter’s not a site, it’s a protocol [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do brands belong on Twitter? Yes and no &#8212; mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.human20.com/twitters-not-a-site-its-a-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Do brands belong on Twitter? Yes and no &#8212; mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitcurrent.com/?p=363#comment-231</guid>
		<description>[...] My friend Alistair Croll also has some interesting thoughts about how Twitter isn&#8217;t a site, it&#8217;s a protocol.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My friend Alistair Croll also has some interesting thoughts about how Twitter isn&#8217;t a site, it&#8217;s a protocol.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

